Environmental

U.S. Military Goes Green: Eco Projects Soar

U.S. Military Goes Green: Eco Projects Soar

With a new emphasis on sustainable and renewable technological development, the 21st century military has been developing inventions that will help make the armed forces of the future have less of an impact on our planet.

In the furthest reaches of Afghanistan, the United States Marine Corps is running bases that generate their own power with solar arrays.  These bases don't need to pull any energy from fossil fuels or outside power plants—useful in a country where mountainous terrain and difficult relations with local tribes can mean serious problems in keeping on the grid.

The biggest solar generation facility in the United States isn't part of a business's effort to green up their act.  It belongs to the United States Air Force.  At the Nellis AFB, in sunny Nevada, an array of solar panels produces as much energy as taking thousands of houses off the grid, or nearly 200,000 cars off the street.

Even some of the most controversial locations of United States military bases are getting in on the green action.  The Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba is now run by the biggest diesel/wind power generation facility in the entire world.

Marines' packs are lighter because of sunlight in Afghanistan.  Communications gear batteries weigh down gear packs, so the Marine Corps added a blanket-style solar panel that unfolds during the daytime.  This solar pack packs enough charge to cut a total of 20 pounds of batteries from every pack of communications gear.

Because the U.S. military is run on such a large scale, even seemingly minor changes can have a significant impact on the environment.  Gas cap rings that look at fuel consumption and notice when mileage is declining are expected to save millions of total man-hours on odometer checks.  The faster recognition of declining fuel mileage will also significantly cut fuel consumption from older vehicles in need of maintenance.

Everyone in the military needs to sleep sometime, and many service members sleep on base.  For these service members, the military is now working on recycled material mattresses.  Within a few years, up to 500,000 soldiers could be using the mattresses, which are also said to be up to five times as durable as a normal mattress—because the materials are completely washable.

The Navy isn't staying out of the action, either.  The Great Green Fleet project aims to power ships partially or fully with renewable and sustainable power sources instead of using fossil fuels.

Sources: army.mil, doe.gov, darpa.mil, whitehouse.gov

Grand Jury Indicts Driller for Dumping Fracking Waste

 Grand Jury Indicts Driller for Dumping Fracking Waste

The controversial hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” technique for natural gas drilling came under fire again last week as a driller from Poland, Ohio was indicted by a jury in Youngstown.  The driller, Benedict Lupo, was charged with violations of federal environmental laws that could result in a prison sentence of up to three years and a fine of up to $250,000.

Lupo, along with his company and one of its employees, were charged with crimes stemming from the alleged dumping of over 20,000 gallons of waste from a fracking site.  The toxic liquids, which included heavy metals and crude oil in salt water, also contained benzene and toluene, two hazardous substances that are part of the waste generated from hydraulic fracturing operations.

In order to drill a well for natural gas using hydraulic fracking, water and toxic solvents are pumped hundreds of tons at a time into rock deep under the ground.  The pressure of the water forces the rock to open up, which exposes pockets of natural gas that formed millions of years ago.

While fracking always generates toxic waste, the state of Ohio has designated specific injection wells for the disposal of this waste.  Using this form of disposal costs money, though, and Lupo's company is accused of choosing instead to dispose of the fracking waste into a storm drain.

Unlike sanitary sewers (the kind used for toilets), storm sewers don't lead to a treatment facility and instead dump directly into the water supply.  The Mahoning River in Youngstown is where the 20,000 gallons of solvents and salt water eventually ended up, according to the prosecution in the case.

After receiving an anonymous tip regarding illegal dumping, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources sent agents to observe the location where the dumping was supposedly occurring.  These agents allegedly saw additional dumping taking place in front of them.

Even after his federal trial is over, Benedict Lupo could be in for additional legal trouble from the state of Ohio.  The state Attorney General's office is currently investigating accusations that Lupo's company stored fracking waste improperly and transported it in potentially hazardous ways, both of which are civil infractions with fines of up to $25,000 per day.

While the trial is being conducted, Lupo's operating permits for his six fracking sites have been pulled by the state.  Fracking has come under fire from many environmental groups nationwide, which say that the risks of toxic pollutants going into the environment makes hydraulic fracturing a bad energy investment.

Source: uscourts.gov

Significant Steps for Quanta Resources Superfund Site in NJ

Significant Steps for Quanta Resources Superfund Site in NJ

 

On November 19, 2012, the Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a significant step for the cleanup of the Quanta Resources Superfund site located in Edgewater, New Jersey.  The EPA has reached an agreement with Honeywell International Inc and 23 other parties to start design work before construction for the project begins.  The agreement also requires Honeywell to handle cleanup procedures with oversight from the EPA. 

The Quanta Site cleanup is expected to allow the facility to operate again in the future, but there is a long road to recovery.  The site’s soil and ground water are currently contaminated with lead, arsenic, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and volatile organic compounds—all capable of causing serious health problems and even cancer.

Once the project’s design is completed, cleanup will begin on the site beside the Hudson River.  The cleanup will take about two to three years and cost an estimated $78 million. 

The EPA split the investigation and cleanup into two different phases—one for contaminated soil and groundwater, and the other for the river and its sediment.  The first plan was finalized by July 2010, and as required by law, the EPA addressed public comments on the proposed cleanup project for 60 days.  The second part of the cleanup was finalized today on November 19, 2012, and the EPA is currently accepting public comment. 

The site was used as a coal tar facility starting in the 1880s.  In the 1970s, the site was used as a “tank farm” for storing waste oil before reprocessing, but the site was closed down in 1981 by the state of New Jersey after polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were found in the waste oil.  The waste oil, sludge, and contaminated water in the tanks were removed immediately, and the tanks were eventually taken off the site. 

Today, it is estimated there are 150,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil beneath the site.  The EPA has approved a plan to solidify areas around the soil contaminated with arsenic and oily liquid by introducing leak-proof blocks around the soil. 

The following companies have agreed to the EPA’s consent decree as well:

·  BASF Corporation

·  Beazer East Inc.

·  BFI Waste Systems of New Jersey Inc.

·  BorgWarner Inc.

·  Chemical Leaman Tank Lines Inc. (Quality Carriers)

·  Colonial Pipeline Co.

·  Consolidated Rail Corp.

·  Exxon Mobil Corp

·  Ford Motor Company

·  General Dynamics Land Systems Inc.

·  Hess Corp.

·   MillerBrewing Co.

·   NEAPCO Inc.

·   Northrup Grumman Systems Corp.

·   Petroleum Tank Cleaners Inc.

·   Rome Strip Steel Co. Inc.

·   Quanta Resources Corp.

·   Stanley Black & Decker Inc.

·   Textron Inc. 

·   United Technologies Corp.

EPA Regional Administrator Judith A. Enck explained how the Superfund program works: “The Superfund program operates on the principle that polluters should pay for the cleanups, rather than passing the costs to taxpayers.  “The EPA searches for parties responsible for the contamination and holds them accountable. This agreement is an important part of that process and a step in the right direction.”

Source: Department of Justice

 

Tennessee Now Owns Virgin Falls State Natural Area

Tennessee Now Owns Virgin Falls State Natural Area

 

On November 15, 2012, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) announced that the state acquired the Virgin Falls State Natural Area located in White County.  The Virgin Falls area has been under private ownership until the recent acquisition by the state, but the state has managed the natural area for about 40 years. 

The state was able to purchase the famous natural area by working with the Tennessee Parks and Greenways Foundation.  The state received funds from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA), and other private donors. 

The state was able to receive federal funding through the Endangered Species Recovery Land Acquisition Fund because there are four threatened and endangered species located on the 1,551 acres of property.  Apart from simply maintaining the property, the new federal funds will help restore some of the habitat through a land management plan. 

Commissioner Bob Martineau with TDEC stated: “TDEC wishes to acknowledge the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and TWRA for their continued support.  Without the support of the USFWS endangered species grant program and TWRA’s generosity and guidance, the state would not be as successful in the recovery and protection of significant rare species and habitats like those within Virgin Falls.”

Virgin Falls is the most recent natural area established by the state since the Tennessee State Parks system was formed in 1937.  The Virgin Falls area is adjacent to the Bridgestone Firestone Centennial Wilderness Wildlife Management Area that is also owned by the state.  The gorges that make up Virgin Falls stretch for about 18 miles as the Caney Fork River descends from the Cumberland Plateau and drains into the Cumberland River. 

Most of the property will be managed by Tennessee State Parks and the State Natural Areas program, but the TWRA will also help maintain the property. 

Deputy Commissioner Brock Hill with TDEC stated: “This particular property possesses special qualities found on the Cumberland Plateau and its scenic beauty is hard to match.  We are particularly thankful for Kathleen Williams and the Tennessee Parks and Greenways Foundation for their immeasurable support and long-time commitment to protect this significant property, along with the many businesses and individuals who have generously contributed to the Virgin Falls effort.” 

There are a total of 54 state parks and 82 natural areas in the state.  These natural resources range from the Mississippi River to the Appalachian Mountains. 

Source: Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation

17 States Guarantee Hunting and Fishing as Constitutional Right

17 States Guarantee Hunting and Fishing as Constitutional Right

 

In November of 2012, the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) reported that 17 states now guarantee its citizens the constitutional right of hunting and fishing.  Voters approved the right to fish and hunt in 16 of the 17 states. 

Vermont was the first state to introduce language into its constitution about the right to fish and hunt in 1777, but the rest of the states have approved similar state constitutional rights since 1996.  Vermont and the following states have specific language in their constitutions for the right to fish AND hunt: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming. 

Many consider Alaska’s constitutional language as giving rights to fish and hunt as well.  They state’s law reads: “Wherever occurring in their natural state, fish, wildlife, and waters are reserved to the people for common use.”

Two states, California and Rhode Island, guarantee fishing as a constitutional right, but these states don’t provide hunting as a constitutional right—partly due to their strict gun laws. 

During the November election in 2012, Idaho, Kentucky, Nebraska, and Wyoming, passed legislative ballots to add the right to hunt and fish into their state constitutions.  The state of Mississippi deferred the legislative amendment to the 2014 ballot. 

Seven states introduced legislation to give constitutional rights for fishing and hunting in November of 2012, but the legislation did not pass.  These states include Hawaii, Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York and Pennsylvania. 

During the 2010 ballot, four states attempted to provide the right to fish and hunt in their constitutions.  The legislative measures passed in Arkansas, South Carolina, and Tennessee, but Arizona rejected the initiative and stood as the first state to reject the initiatives. 

Years that States Passed Constitutional Rights for Fishing and Hunting

Alabama, 1996

Arkansas, 2010

Georgia, 2006

Idaho, 2012

Kentucky, 2012

Louisiana, 2004

Minnesota, 1998

Montana, 2004

Nebraska, 2012

North Dakota, 2000

Oklahoma, 2008

South Carolina, 2010

Tennessee, 2010

Vermont, 1777

Virginia, 2000

Wisconsin, 2003

Wyoming, 2012

Numerous issues have caused a large percentage of sportsmen and sportswomen to push for such legislation in recent years.  Cities and suburbs are pushing into wooded land, the number of sportsmen and sportswomen is decreasing, and there are more and more restrictions on hunting and fishing.  Other recreational activities like hiking and off-road biking have also reduced land for people who hunt and fish.  The constitutional right guarantees that those who hunt and fish can continue to do so in the future. 

Source: National Conference of State Legislatures

56 Small Business Awarded Pollution-Prevention Grants in PA

56 Small Business Awarded Pollution-Prevention Grants in PA

 

On November 8, 2012, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection awarded $418,049 of grants to 56 small businesses throughout the state to help them become energy efficient or prevent pollution. 

The grant program, called the Small Business Advantage Grant program, is funded under the Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act.  The program applies to businesses with 100 or less employees, and it provides reimbursements of 50 percent up to $9,500.  The projects ultimately help the small businesses reduce pollution by 25 percent or save up to 25 percent in energy costs. 

Since the program began in 2004, 1,642 small businesses in the state have received $6.6 million.

The grants are announced twice every year, and the budget for the grants during the fiscal year is $1 million.  The 56 new grants are expected to create private-sector investment up to $1,542,437 for small businesses. 

Some common projects funded by the grants include upgrades on insulation and high-efficiency HVAC, efficient lighting systems, installation of efficient heat pumps, and new auxiliary power units to help trucks reduce idling time. 

The following grants are listed alphabetically by county:

Bedford County
Graham Trucking, $4,350

Berks County
Berks Gymnastics, $4,815
Bruno’s Trucking LLC, $4,350
Shawn R. Habakus, DMD, $9,500

Bradford County
Ram Tire and Auto Service, $4,865

Butler County
Hutchinson Dry Cleaners, $9,500
Warren C. Sauers Co. Inc., $4,350

Chester County
Nova Cleaners, $8,630

Cumberland County
Business Development Systems Inc., $9,500
R.D.S. Transport LLC, $5,400
Quality Cleaners Inc., $9,500

Erie County
JLS Trucking, $4,350

Forest County
Cathedral Pines Inc., $5,855

Jefferson County
Barber Trucking Inc., $9,500
Jodat Technologies Co. Inc., $6,806
Mary’s Place, $9,409

Lancaster County
Abel Tire Inc., $3,747
Hendricks’ Flowers, $9,500

Lehigh County
Suh’s Sun Cleaners Inc., $9,500

Luzerne County
Jim Jaster LLC, $9,500

Lycoming County
Faxon Cleaners Inc., $4,539
Hermance and Strouse Inc., $9,295
Paulhamus Litho Inc., $9,500
West Branch Tennis Club, $3,449

McKean County
The Grocery Stretcher, $7,761

Mercer County
Franklin Trucking, $4,350
Respect Trucking Inc., $4,887
Wheaton Dry Cleaners, $8,038

Mifflin County
K.R.W. Services Inc., $4,350
Kerstetter Trucking, $9,500
Monument Square Center LLC, $9,500

Monroe County
Personal Touch Cleaners of Tannersville Inc., $9,500

Montgomery County
King of Prussia Veterinary Hospital, $9,500
Ralph’s Corner Cleaners and Tailors, $9,500

Northampton County
David L. Danner, $1,612
Tobacco and More Inc., $1,310

Philadelphia County
Adam’s Run Cleaners, $9,500
Amy Swan Cleaners Inc., $9,500
Choice Cleaners Inc., $9,500
Hahn Shelmire Cleaners, $9,500
Jones Smith Assoc. LLC, $7,250
New Riff Cleaners, $9,500
P and J One Hour Cleaners, $9,500
Professional One Hour Cleaners, $ 9,500
6301 Royal Cleaners Inc., $9,500
S. M. and Jake Inc., $9,500
Saul N. Miller DDS, $9,500
TGV Inc., $9,500
Yoon’s Family Cleaners, $9,500

Schuylkill County
Edward’s Flowers, $2,218

Snyder County
Ideal Self Storage LLC, $3,955

Susquehanna County
Creative Window and Door Inc., $8,258

Washington County
Bedner’s Farm and Greenhouse, $9,500
Minerd and Sons Inc., $9,500

Westmoreland County
Gilbert P. Hribal II, $4,350

Wyoming County
Penn’s Best Inc., $9,500

Small businesses are encouraged to apply for the bi-annual grants in Pennsylvania.  For more information on the Small Business Advantage Grant Program, call the Small Business Ombudsman’s Office at (717) 772-8909.

Source: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

60 Percent of Biggest Cities in US are Smoke-Free

60 Percent of Biggest Cities in US are Smoke-Free

 

On November 15, 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced that 60 percent of the largest US cities are now covered by laws that prohibit smoking in indoor areas like restaurants, workplaces, bars, and similar areas. 

The CDC noted huge advancements in anti-smoking laws since 2000.  Only one of the 50 largest cities in the United States had anti-smoking laws in 2000: San Jose, California.  Now, as of October 5, 2012, 16 of the 50 largest cities in the United States are covered by local smoke-free laws, and 14 of the largest cities are covered by state smoke-free laws. 

Only three percent of Americans were protected by smoke-free laws in 2000, and now more than 50 percent are covered.  The majority of smoke-free laws are regulated under local ordinances, but North Dakota just passed statewide smoke-free laws in the first week of November—the first state to adopt such laws since 2010. 

The new standards have curbed exposure to toxic secondhand smoke, which can cause serious health problems like heart attacks, lung cancer, and respiratory problems.  Second hand smoke is especially dangerous to young children, and exposure can cause infant death syndrome (SIDS), ear infections, asthma attacks, and more. 

It is estimated that about 443,000 nonsmoking Americans (46,000 from heart disease and 3,400 from lung cancer) die every year because of secondhand smoke exposure.  According to a 2006 Surgeon General’s Report, there is no level of secondhand-smoke exposure that is risk free. 

CDC Director Thomas R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H., stated: “Communities have made tremendous progress eliminating smoking from worksites and public places in 60 percent of big cities in the United States. Smoke-free laws save lives and don’t hurt business.  If we can protect workers and the public in the remaining 20 largest cities, 16 million people would be better protected from cancer and heart disease caused by secondhand smoke.”

According to the study, “Comprehensive Smoke-Free Laws—50 Largest U.S. Cities, 2000 and 2012,” 10 out of 20 states with no smoke-free laws are located in the south.  The study was published in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Tim McAfee, M.D., M.P.H., with the CDC’s Office on Smoking and Health, stated: “If we continue to progress as we have since 2000, all Americans could be protected from secondhand smoke exposure in workplaces and public places by 2020.”

Smoke-free laws protect nonsmokers in public areas, but studies find that the laws help a percentage of smokers quit smoking as well. 

Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Australia Creates World’s Largest Network of Marine Reserves

Australia Creates World’s Largest Network of Marine Reserves

 

On November 16, 2012, Australia’s Environment Minister, Tony Burke, announced requirements to protect over 2.3 million square kilometers of ocean environment.  The area of protected ocean now becomes the largest protected area of sea in the world. 

Praising Australia, Burke stated, “Australia is a world leader when it comes to protecting our oceans, and so we should be, we've got responsibility for more of the ocean than almost any other country on Earth.”

Some commercial fishers expressed their outrage over the reservation of the marine environments, but the Australian government has taken several measures to ensure fishers are least affected by the marine sanctuaries. 

Burke stated, “Even though the new marine reserves have been designed in a way to minimize impacts on industry and recreational users, the Government recognizes that there will be impacts on some fishers and we will support those impacted.”

Additionally, the Australian Government has allocated about $100 million for fisheries adjustment assistance. 

The management plans will follow the schedule below:

·  the plans will address how the reserves should be managed, what types of gear can be used in the reserves, and what activities cannot occur in the reserves

·  while the development of the management plans occur, temporary arrangements will be made for commercial and recreational fishers

·  no “on the water” changes will be made for users of the area from November 17, 2012 until the new management plans become effective in July of 2014

·  all areas with existing management policies will continue to follow the regulations until the new management policies take effect in July of 2014

The new marine reserves are established in the following large marine regions:

Coral Sea Region

This region covers an area half the size of Queensland and is an important nesting site for green turtles as well as an important habitat for sharks and predatory fish. 

Southwest Marine Region

This area stretches from South Australia to Shark Bay in Western Australia.  It is an important breeding ground for species like southern right whales, blue whales, and the Australian Sea Lion. 

Temperate East Marine Region

This area stretches from the southern-most boundary of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park to Bermagui in New South Wales.  This area is home to the endangered grey nurse shark and threatened white shark. 

Northwest Marine Region

This is an area between the border of the Western Australian/Northern Territory and Kalbarri in Western Australia.  The area is home to the largest fish in the world, the whale shark, and provides protection for migratory humpback whales. 

North Marine Region

This area extends as far west to the border of the Northern Territory and Western Australia and includes the waters of the Gulf of Carpentaria, Arafura Sea, and Timor Sea.  This area provides refuge for migratory seabirds, and threatened flatback, hawksbill, green, and olive marine turtles use the area as a resting area. 

Source: AU Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities

Conservation Groups File Suit Against Kill-at-Will Wolf Policy

Conservation Groups File Suit Against Kill-at-Will Wolf Policy

 

On November 14, 2012, conservation groups filed a suit against the federal government for lifting protection of wolves in Wyoming under the Endangered Species Act.  The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service originally handed responsibility of wolf management over to the state, even though the Kill-at-Will Wolf Policy is now allowed throughout most of the state of Wyoming. 

Conservation groups claim that wolves are only offered limited protection in areas not covered by the Kill-at-Will Wolf Policy, and they also claim that huge numbers of wolves will be killed and stop the recovery of the wolf population in Wyoming.  The group filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. 

Franz Camenzind, a retired Ph.D. wildlife biologist living in Jackson Hole, stated: “Wyoming’s wolf-management plan is poor policy, weak in its protection of wolves, and based on flimsy science.  Wyoming's plan sets a very disturbing precedent for other states by abdicating management responsibility of a native wildlife species over approximately 85 percent of the state.”

A total of 49 wolves have been killed in Wyoming since the state took over management plans on October 1, 2012.  The killings were performed by state hunting exercises and by private citizens in the “predator zones.”  The number is likely higher because of unreported kills, and the number has already severely reduced the wolf population.  There were only about 328 wolves in the state before the state took over management plans. 

Wolves within the predator zones can be shot, snared or trapped, and the wolves can be pursued by helicopters, planes, ATVs, and snowmobiles.  Wolf pups are even allowed to be killed in their dens. 

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has denied Wyoming the right to manage their own wolf population in the past because of strict anti-wolf laws in the state, but the state is now virtually free to do what it wants with the wolves in the predator zones.  Conservation groups and independent studies state the reintroduction of gray wolves into the northern Rockies has helped increase the region’s economy and restore ecological balance.  

Noah Greenwald, the endangered species director with the Center for Biological Diversity, stated: “Like past versions of Wyoming’s wolf plan—which were rejected by the Fish and Wildlife Service—the new plan fails to ensure the long-term survival and recovery of these unique animals. The decision to remove protections for Wyoming’s wolves failed to rely on best science. It’s a tragic political intrusion into what should be the scientifically guided management of an important endangered species.”

Source: EarthJustice

DARN Properties in Milford Fined for Asbestos Violations

DARN Properties in Milford Fined for Asbestos Violations

 

On November 8, 2012, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (Mass DEP) fined DARN Properties, LLC in Milford for violating state asbestos regulations.  The company was fined a total of $28,372.50 in connection with a renovation project in September of 2011. 

During the renovations, the Mass DEP performed an inspection to make sure any possible asbestos was removed correctly.  During the inspection, it was determined that DARN Properties, LLC removed floor tiles with asbestos and disposed of the tiles in an open-air dumpster on the property. 

Once the Mass DEP discovered the asbestos violations, it required DARN Properties to contact the Massachusetts Department of Labor Standards immediately and hire a licensed asbestos contractor to follow protocol in handling, packaging, and disposing of the asbestos tiles.  The dumpster as well as all affected areas on the property were decontaminated as well. 

The Mass DEP fined DARN Properties for these specific violations: “Failing to notify Mass DEP of a demolition/renovation operation involving asbestos-containing materials; and for the improper removal, handling, packing, labeling and storage of asbestos-containing waste materials.” 

State regulations, as well as federal regulations, require companies to notify the Mass DEP or their state’s environmental regulatory agency before the removal of the asbestos begins.  Proper removal and disposal procedures are particularly important with asbestos because the fibers can cause serious health problems. 

The company is required to pay an assessed penalty of $8,500 immediately.  The rest of the fine will be suspended ($19,872.50) if the company follows proper protocol and has no other violations for an entire year. 

Lee Dillard Adams, the director of Mass DEP’s Central Regional Office, announced: “Owners involved with building renovation work must be fully aware of their responsibilities under the regulations to ensure the proper removal, handling, packaging and disposal of asbestos-containing materials.”

He went on say, “Failure to notify Mass DEP of asbestos removal, and to follow prescribed work practices is an extremely serious, and ultimately a costly oversight that potentially exposes workers, tenants and the general public to a known carcinogen.”

If you’re a property owner or contractor and have questions about materials containing asbestos, procedures for asbestos removal, or regulations on asbestos, you should contact the Mass DEP for more information.  You can call 617-292-5500 or write:

1 Winter Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02108

Mass DEP helps enforce clean air and clean water standards, the management of solid and hazardous waste, and the preservation of wetlands and beaches. 

Source: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection