Joplin Receives $2.4M for Contaminated Soil Projects
On September 20, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced the launch of the Sustainable Materials Management Electronics Challenge (SMM). The initiate encourages manufacturers and retailers to make recycling and refurbishing a standard within the electronics industry.
During the announcement, Lisa Feldt, the EPA Deputy Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response, was joined by major leaders like Best Buy, LG Electronics, Panasonic, Samsung, Sharp, and Staples. The announcement occurred at the Vintage Tech Recyclers in Romeoville, Illinois.
The companies participating in SMM have agreed to send 100 percent of all use electronics to third-party refurbishers and recycling centers. The companies will also increase efforts to collect more use electronics from consumers.
In order for a recycler to become certified, they need to undergo an audit that checks to see if recycling and management of the used electronics meets industry standards. Many of the certified recyclers are growing. For example, Vintage Tech Recyclers devoted 80 percent of all new jobs to third-party certification.
EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson stated, “Already, the United States generates almost 2.5 million tons of electronic waste per year—and that number will only grow. Used electronics have materials in them that can be recovered and recycled, reducing the economic costs and environmental impacts of securing and processing new materials for new products.”
The EPA makes clear that reliability on electronics increases the importance of recycling precious materials in the devices. Electronics contain rare-earth metals, copper, plastic and glass, all of which can be recycled. The mining of manufacturing of these materials uses energy and releases greenhouse gases, but by recycling the materials, the carbon footprint is reduced and industry prices slow.
Dell, Sony, and Sprint have also agreed to work with the EPA to manage their used electronics.
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
On November 9, 2012, the Department of Justice announced that the owner and operator of an environmental laboratory in Mississippi was charged for falsifying records about industrial wastewater and then obstructing an investigation by federal authorities. The defendant, Teenie White, was charged in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.
White is the owner and operator of Mississippi Environmental Analytical Laboratories, Inc. She faces three charges. Two of the charges are for making false statements and the third charge is for obstructing justice.
The indictment states that White was hired by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) to test waste water sample at various industrial manufacturers throughout the state. White was required to compile month reports of discharge from the manufacturers and submit the results to the MDEQ.
The indictment indicates that White falsely created three different discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) for testing that was never done in the first place. She also created a false laboratory report and presented it to a client in order to prepare another DMR. The false reporting occurred from February to August of 2009. White lied to authorities she was approached by a federal agent who was investigating the information in the reports.
White is subject to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine for each count of false statements. She faces up to 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for obstruction. She is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Richard J. Powers with the Environmental Crimes Section under the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, as well as Assistant U.S. Attorney Gaine Cleveland with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Mississippi.
Source: U.S. Department of Justice
On November 29, 2012, the London-based Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) released a new report, titled Appetite for Destruction: China’s Trade in Illegal Timber. The report reveals China is the largest importer, exporter, and consumer of illegal timber in the world, all the while emphasizing how policies in China (and the world’s largest importers from China) add to deforestation in Southeast Asia.
The EIA estimates, conservatively, that China imported 18.5 million cubic meters of illegal timber in 2011 alone. Such estimates are worth $3.7 billion.
The largest timber consumers in the world—the United States, the European Union, and Australia—have passed legislation in the last decade to help protect shrinking forests and particularly rainforests. The largest producing countries like Indonesia have also increased enforcement efforts to deter illegal logging.
Still, China proceeds to import and export a massive amount of illegal timber.
Faith Doherty, head of the EIA’s Forests Campaign, paints a clear picture of China’s illegal timber campaign: “China is now effectively exporting deforestation around the world.”
The true extent of China’s illegal timber campaign has been investigated by EIA field investigators since 2004 in places like China itself, Indonesia, Laos, Madagascar, Mozambique, Myanmar, Far East Russia, and Vietnam.
Doherty stresses that further legislation and enforcement need to immediately target illegal timber trading in East Asia before it’s too late. She states, “Any further meaningful progress to safeguard the forests of the world is being undermined unless the Chinese Government acts swiftly and decisively to significantly strengthen its enforcement and ensure that illegal timber is barred from its markets.”
The report goes as far to say “China’s Government has done virtually nothing to curb illegal imports” while ensuring current policies create a steady supply from illegal logging areas.
Currently, the US Lacey Act and the EU Timber Regulation target illegal wood products from China, but the EIA states that such regulations need increasingly enforced.
The EIA’s report states China needs to take the following legislative and industrial steps:
· create clear prohibitions against imports on illegal logs
· let the Commerce and Foreign Ministries and the State Forest Administration (SFA) help stop illegal logging
· know the specific laws on timber production and trade from all other countries
· help protect threatened tree species listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES)
· work with Chinese companies overseas to make revised policies mandatory
· mandate laws that criminalize Chinese companies that bribe foreign officials
· stop the influence of state-owned enterprises that export illegal timber to China
Source: Environmental Investigation Agency
On November 30, 2012, the Fish and Wildlife Service announced that the prairie chicken is now considered threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). According to the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), the decision by the Fish and Wildlife Service will likely cause state and federal wildlife agencies to issues stricter permits and operations of energy developers and ranchers in the bird’s habitat.
The bird is mainly found in Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado—states that all have large farming and ranching industries as well as large amounts of oil, gas, and wind energy development.
David Festa, the Vice President of the Land, Water and Wildlife program for the EDF, states: “In the past, these kinds of ESA listing decisions have led to years of litigation and conflict. Now, with the lesser prairie chicken, we’re working with land users to set up Wildlife Habitat Exchanges that provide cooperative, cost-effective habitat conservation.”
After the listing of the lesser prairie chicken under the ESA, the EDF is going to work with landowners, developers, and companies that will help protect the chicken’s habitat at the lowest cost possible while letting industry continue in the areas without debate and litigation. The Wildlife Habitat Exchanges will recruit private landowners—such as farmers and ranchers—to maintain the habitat of the chicken, and the land can then be leased to energy companies and other developers so the companies can meet obligations under the ESA to protect wildlife.
Steve Swaffar with the Kansas Farm Bureau states: “Habitat Exchanges are a smart solution for threatened species such as the lesser prairie chicken. Exchanges deliver quantifiable measures of habitat and resources, at the same time giving private landowners an opportunity to derive income by providing for the specific needs of the species, and continue to use their property for agriculture production.”
The EDF reports that about 90 percent of the bird’s habitat is on private land. Other states have used Habitat Exchanges in the past and the initiatives have proven extremely successful. For example, Texas used Habitat Exchanges to protect the golden checked warbler and increase the bird’s numbers.
The Fish and Wildlife Service’s listing was only an initial decision, and it has a year to make the final listing decision.
David Festa remained optimistic about Wildlife Habitat Exchanges: “EDF supports Wildlife Habitat Exchanges as a proven model that could change the trajectory of the lesser prairie chicken. It can bring the species back from the brink and put it on a path toward recovery before the final listing decision is made.”
Source: Environmental Defense Fund
Despite tighter international controls on ivory, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) warns that African Rhinos may become extinct in 10 years if immediate action is not taken by the international community. The WWF reports that 588 rhinos and tens of thousands of elephants were killed in 2012.
There are several reasons for the increased amount of rhino poaching: the demand for rhino horn in Asia continues to increase, and local citizens in Africa can earn a substantial amount of money from just several poaches.
Dr Joseph Okori, the WWF’s African Rhino Programme leader, states: “Villagers are at the bottom of the chain and can earn several months income through two or three days of poaching. Huge amounts of money is in circulation.”
The most demand for illegal ivory is in Asia, and particularly Viet Nam. Large amounts of illegal ivory reach markets in China and Thailand as well. There is a market expanding on rhinoceros horns as well. For example, appliances capable of grinding up rhinoceros horns sell for about $450 in Vietnam.
Laws and regulations against ivory trade already exist at the federal level and state level in the United States. For example, the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and the African Elephant Conservation Act of 1989 specifically outlaw the trading of ivory, and state laws vary between jurisdictions. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITIES) also banned the illegal trading of ivory.
Still, the WWF states that more regulations and stricter penalties need instituted and consuming nations need to decrease their demand for illegal ivory immediately to save the African Rhino.
Namibia is an example of increasing protection for the African Rhino. The country’s government works with local populations and developed a management plan to protect the rhinos. The country has the lowest rate of poaching in all of Africa. Similar management plans are reaching Botswana, South Africa, and Zambia as well.
The WWF has also developed a DNA registry for a total of 5,600 rhinos. The DNA information can help African governments track down and try poachers in court.
Hakan Wirtén, the Secretary General of WWF Sweden, called out to the international community to help save the African Rhino: “We welcome the fact that the Swedish government has provided increased support for stricter border control, as well as other measures to combat smuggling and poaching. Both governments and tourists need to take more responsibility. People should absolutely not buy souvenirs from endangered species or carved ivory souvenirs while on holiday.”
Source: World Wildlife Fund